Nikon e2 serial no

Last edited by NikonWeb on Sat Jan 07, am, edited 93 times in total. I've updated the list. It's serial number I'll re-check those numbers, but I'd guess I've left a zero out of the 2nd number, should be and Corrected serial numbers for E-series cameras Post by drummond93 » Tue Aug 23, am Here's my corrected list, they are all 7-digit series; E2s - E2s - a a E3 - E3s - Stan, did you ever get working? I wonder what the serial number was for the other one the florida seller sold to Nxsdream??

Or was it somebody else? That's all that was wrong with the Well, it needed a little cleaning of the front element in the ROS and such, but everything does work properly.

BTW, If anyone finds themsleves in need of any F4 parts - except for the now screwed up power switch from my attempt to 'make it work' in the E2 - from an F4 with MB, let me know. It was a dead F4 off of eBay, so it wasn't really a loss. I'm currently using it as an 'optical checker' for Nikon lenses. So, I now need a really trashed E-Series unit to swipe the power switch from to put the E2 back in order. The switch will stay in the at this point, since I have a couple of uses for one of these things, and the is the better choice to actually shoot with faster ROS, buffer, 3 fps, etc.

Next on the list: stick some new cells into my E-series battey packs. Wild Speculations Post by NIKON KIU » Sat Sep 24, pm I have been looking at this thread for months trying to make some sense with this numbering system Could it be that Nikon went retro and started the E series numbering system like the old times First digit being the year of manufature With the original Nikons the second digit was the month of manufacture but that doesn't make sense with the numbers we have collected.

Second digit being the batches As you note the newer the model the higher the serial number E2's start with 5 for E3S's start with 8 or 9 for and I know its a wild guess but its the best I could think of. Makes a lot of sense, that does! So where we stand is this: older gear clearly follows the original numbering practice in the table shown at the top of this page.

The latest gear is much more complicated in how serial numbers are used. That said, a serial number with 0 as the second digit is almost always allocated according to the table, above. As I noted two decades ago, Nikon really just needs to abandon this serialization practice. Which Nikkors Have Fluorine Coating? What Matters Most? New or Old for the Exotic Telephotos?

What is Micro Contrast? What is Tack Sharp? Can I use a Sigma teleconverter on a Nikon lens? Why do you seem to be so negative about teleconverters? How do I stack teleconverters? Like in the EDG I suspect Nikon is making the images darker than necessary to crush the blacks and thereby increasing perceived contrast at the expense of brightness. Contrast and sharpness: The Nikon is - typical for Nikon - brutally sharp, but if we look at finer details and textures, it cannot quite match the Habicht.

Build quality. The Nikon feels nice in the hands, build quality seems very good, but I would not want to drop it. I admit this is pure gut feeling. I returned the Nikon with a sigh, simply because I have this Austrian bird of paradise. But if price, flare control and field of view is more important for you than one of the most lovely glowing images in binoculars I like porros. I totally love my Habicht 8x30, despite its bad flaring.

I really enjoyed the Nikon 8x32 SE, the cheapest real premium binocular I ever owned. I later sold it simply because I chose to take the brighter, more sparkling Habicht with me most of the time. I have been very curious about the Nikon 8x30 E2, among binocular fans it has an excellent reputation.

It looks like the only living descendent of the beautiful Zeiss West 8x30 porro.